Legal Brief Essay

Case name, citation, and court Ashley County, atomic number 18 v. Pfizer, Inc, 552 F.3d 659 (8th Cir. 2009) compend of Key Facts An ingredient widely utilize in Pfizers products is a indispensable ingredient in the manufacturing of crankamphetamine in small toxic labs which are trusty for dangerous explosions, burns, and toxic fumes.Arkansas has matchless of the largest numbers of small toxic labs in the US and is burdened with high cost of struggle the meth epidemic and is desire to recoup some of the funds that the coun espouses of Arkansas have spent.The Issue Is Pfizer ethically amenable for abeting in the funding of fighting the meth epidemic? The Holding Since Pfizer is a major(ip) manufacturer of products containing necessary ingredients used in illegal meth labs and the counties of Arkansas has been so heavily financially burdened by these labs, the damages are obvious.The counties have suffered financial loss from battling a drug that could non be made without t he ingredients in Pfizers products. Because of these damages and Pfizers role in the supply of ingredients to drug labs, it is the responsibility of Pfizer to either, reinforce the counties and finance the future costs of fighting the meth epidemic or materialise alternative ingredients to use in their products that cannot be used in the manufacture of meth. epitome of Your Reasoning It is the corporate responsibility of Pfizer to assist in funding the counties operations battling meth. to a lower place a corporate citizenship view, Pfizer is responsible for bestow to the solution of the social problem that their products create. churl is an epidemic rapidly sweeping the estate and it is the responsibility of anyone, or company, with any tie to the drug at all, to contribute to the solution, the said(prenominal) amount that they contribute to the problem.